Citroen Grand C4 Picasso reviews

The car turned out to be just SUPER! Everything is a smooth ride (air suspension is installed at the back), the spaciousness and convenience of a chic interior, design (one windshield flowing onto the roof, which is worth it), a unique fixed steering wheel hub (believe me, it’s very convenient), a cool color display in the center , excellent review, the absolute absence of technical problems (for 65,000 km I changed several bulbs and did maintenance after 20,000, while the service for Citroen is one of the cheapest and there are no queues) completely conquered me and my loved ones. for 1.5 years I managed to go 2 times south (1750 km one way), 2
times to the Kirov region (1200 km one way). 31.03.2009 After the addition to the family, my wife and I seriously thought about buying a 7-seater minivan. So I advise those who are looking for a minivan to take a closer look at the C4 Picasso (by the way, there is also a 5-seater version) Recently we decided to buy a second car for the family. The car is SUPER!! simply underestimated by our consumers. The salon is magnificent in all respects; I want to take the steering wheel with me to another car \\ all the controls are on https://cars45.com/listing/toyota/solara/2007 it, but only the BOUBLES SPIN \\. Disadvantages – the 1.6 engine is weak, acceleration is good only at 4000 rpm, the suspension is harsh, the comp. sometimes buggy. That’s right – shock. I have a grand picasso, a 2.0 engine when driving smoothly shifting gears sometimes there are jerks mileage 122000, in a city with a climate the consumption is 15 liters per 100. and so the car is a class Insufficient more Only four-wheel drive could be of interest, and even that turned out to be parquet. We’ve been riding for a month now. The car is beautiful on the outside, the finish inside is good, pleasant to the touch, does not creak, does not rattle. The engine is one of the most enjoyable parts of a car. There was no 2.0l diesel \\ ordered in its configuration at the factory \\. In September 2011, my wife said that she would change it (from 4) only to: the same hybrid or SAAB 9-4x diesel, so we’ll still use it for a couple of years. And this despite the fact that this is not a hybrid, but a regular diesel. Soft, quiet and comfortable ride. We have owned this car for 2 years, together with my wife. I put the Thule trunk on the roof, threw all the small things there, folded 2 seats in the back (they are all separate), put the suitcases – and at the same time I got a huge flat area on which the children played, slept , ate. At the same time, I like to change them quite often. We looked at several options: VW Touran – boring and expensive, Mit.Grandis turned out to be in acceptable equipment with only 6-seater, Renault Scenic was rejected immediately – I didn’t like it. The interior is spacious, the overview is good, the basic equipment is good. In Sweden, I drove half the way 170-190, it keeps the road perfectly. Otherwise, this is the first car that you like completely\\14th in a row\\. The car turned out to be unsuccessful, to put it mildly – there were a lot of technical problems that I don’t even want to even remember. Average consumption for the entire operation of 7.3 liters. and only put on the service.

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso reviews

After adding to the family, my wife and I seriously thought about buying a 7-seater minivan. At that time we had a Ford C-Max. At long distances – pleases not only with comfort, but also with consumption. They refused. 08/10/2009 The car is beautiful on the outside, the finish inside is good, pleasant to the touch, does not creak, does not rattle. We watched the Citroen C-Crosser. Good luck on the roads 🙂 17.04.2011 The car is SUPER!! simply underestimated by our consumers. We went for a test drive and liked it even more. But this is a completely different case. To be honest, I didn’t expect it. We looked at a few more options (Renault Koleos, Suzuki Grand Vitara). At that time we had a Ford C-Max. 07/25/2011 everything is fine, but today, for some reason, after 7000 break-ins, they changed something in the running gear for the amount of 1000 UAH (good under warranty) more The second car was Volvo s 40. 01.2012 The second car was SAAB 9-3 vector aktiv pilot 2009. Studying the press, I accidentally stumbled upon information about the new Citroen van. The only negative is that I waited for 4 months. Where only a tractor drove a couple of times during the winter. From the car. The quality of assembly and materials – does not cause any complaints. But this class of sportiness does not imply. We decided to buy. From the shortcomings: yes. more My wife and I decided that it would be an SUV. Оdense/Danmark/ 16-30-gas station, MacDak- Stockholm/Swe/22-00. An excellent family or just a comfortable car. Engine, chassis: max. As a result, we opted for the Land Rover Freelander2. But that’s a completely different story. 06/08/2011 I have a grand picasso, a 2.0 engine when driving smoothly shifting gears sometimes there are jerks mileage 122000, in a city with a climate the consumption is 15 liters per 100. and so m. more I bought a car, closing my eyes, because of the "ambiguous" attitude at that time to the French car industry. their favor. The only negative, I waited 4 months, there was no 2.0l diesel \\ ordered in its configuration at the factory \\. Yes, the car is not from the "sports". The more the shock was. When the wife punctured the tire Citroen assistans arrived in 20 minutes. For various reasons, they did not suit us. We have owned this car for 2 years, together with my wife. more He is high-torque, unpretentious and has never once demanded attention. I already had a chance to climb on it and climb over snowdrifts. The interior is spacious, the overview is good, the basic equipment is good. Believe me – this is the first car in my life that I don’t want to part with. I was immediately interested in the design and filling. Don’t be afraid of the French! Despite the fact that in terms of spare parts they are not as good as the Germans, in terms of reliability they are definitely not inferior to them! But thoroughly outperform the Germans in terms of cost, comfort and design! For a very long time it was the design that gave pleasure, both outside and inside. Of the shortcomings: heated brushes had to be ordered and the premium sound \\ standard in Volvo is better \\, there was no spare wheel – a complete repair kit was included. everything is fine, but today, for some reason, after 7000 break-ins, they changed something in the running gear in the amount of 1000 UAH (good under warranty) In 2007 brand new unlike other cars. Compared to Picasso – heaven and earth. At speeds around 100 km / h, the car produces an amazing 3.8 liters per 100 km of consumption. We think in a year to change it to a new one, taking into account the shortcomings. The car was, to put it mildly, unsuccessful. more In the forest. 04.09.2009 In 2007 brand new unlike other cars.

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.